Category Archives: Inheritance

Everything is Related, Of and Part of the Whole: Beyond Inheritance, Our Ever-Mutating Cells and a New Understanding of Health and the Economics of Life

 

One of my most current reads and the book that prompted this posting.When Darwin wrote “Origin of the Species” in 1859, he clarified and developed ideas that had been kicking around by those studying natural history and the origin of life, even the possibility of it’s evolution. Lamarck, von Humboldt, Darwin’s own grandfather, Haeckel and others had been speculating, arguing about certain pathways to ‘now’, but without having done that much serious research into life’s intricate relationships. There’s were less bold challenges or conceived theories. Christian orthodoxy shaped the thinking of the time, and opposing it, well that wasn’t done. Creation was pronounced a one time event, that all life forms that existed, had from the beginning by the grace and workings of God. But Darwin, himself a devout Christian, and Alfred Russel Wallace, did do the research, did examine the relationships in depth, adding their insights, the idea of ‘natural selection’, a process that ‘sorts’ through the accumulations of adaptations across a community and populations, ‘selecting’ those that give them a competitive advantage. These, over time would produce progeny at higher rates and would come to dominate a population and species. Since then one question led to another, as is the way of science. Where do these adaptations, these mutations, come from? How frequent are they? Aren’t our chromosomes ‘protected’ from this random degradation and mutation? Are mutations truly random? What drives them? Evolution ‘shows’ that over Earth’s 4.5 billion years, life has evolved towards greater complexity, organisms innovating new structures, variations and with it an increase in the sheer bulk of life, as more species create and fill more niches. Life on life. This can’t then be an entirely random event. Wouldn’t a truly random process result in no net ‘gain’? Wouldn’t it be a 50:50 proposition? One step forward, one step back? What is going on in this mutating?

Roxanne Khamsi, in “Beyond Inheritance”, takes the reader on a guided tour of our rapidly evolving understanding of the mutation of our cells and what it means. Mutation is an essential fact of life, one central to natural selection and the ongoing health of every living individual, and, perhaps our demise. Mutation, however, is commonly understood to be a negative, a degradation of the ideal held in our chromosomes. What’s going on here? Is it necessary or is it bad?
Mutation, it turns out, is pervasive. Every species, every tissue every cell and cell type is subject to it. We’re not talking about what occurs in ‘germ cells’, our egg and sperm,  those all important passers on of our genetic code. There are 30-40 trillion cells, in a mature human body, depending on our size, colonized by a like number of bacterial cells. These cells too, as they are going through a continuous process of metabolizing, internal and external maintenance, repairing and replacing themselves, are much more prone to mutation in this endless process of living. Some human brain cells are thought to survive over the course of our entire lives, but all of the rest, are being replaced at widely varying rates. Those epithelial cells of our intestinal lining are replaced every 3-4 days; we replace around 170,000,000,000, 170 billion red blood cells in our bodies, EVERYDAY. Every single cell replaced in our body, requires that the cell replicate its DNA, the two sets of chromosomes each containing 3.1 billion base pairs, the rungs in the helically shaped ladder of DNA’s structure. 3.1 billion base pairs, each consisting of a specific four ‘letter’ group of Adenine (A), Thymine (T), Guanine (G), and Cytosine (C), a 4 digit quarternary code….Perfect replication of each cell, billions and trillions of times over our lives…‘mistakes’, mutations happen. Organisms, cells, are not machines. We have this idea that machines can perfectly produce products endlessly, but that is wrong. Our continuous ‘cloning’ of our cells is far more precise a process. As the bumper sticker once so popular used to say, Shit happens…and the numbers within a complex, multi-celled animal such as ourselves, are astronomical. Mutations happen. We get stressed, sick, exposed to toxic substances, free radicals, physical trauma, various types of radiation, we age, become sedentary, our systems slow, we slow…as the necessary processes of life go on, within bodies and cells. Most must replicate themselves perfectly over our lives. Nevertheless, given the numbers, mutations accumulate. Some of these enable our continued ‘good’ health, some are benign, while others become ‘negative’ change agents, altering the operation and conditions within us, in what can be very harmful ways. Continue reading

The Emperor of all Maladies: Mukherjee’s look into Our Relationship with Cancer

Siddartha Mukherjee’s first book, “The Emperor of All Maladies: A Biography of Cancer”, is the third of his I’ve read. My interest earlier, and still, remains in understanding the biology of the organism, so I read his books on genetics and the cell first, trying to improve my understanding of the complex actions and structures of life before attempting to understand a disease that ravages and destroys so many lives. His effort to write this book led to Mukherjee receiving the Pulitzer Prize. It is a gargantuan endeavor, artfully constructed. It contains several stories in an overlapping, although, natural style beginning with man’s earliest recorded conception of the disease(s). It becomes clearer and clearer as you read through it that cancer is more a ‘family’ of diseases, linked by their pattens and effects as they progress within the cell and from there, into the collective structures of our body, than it is a singular disease. But that gets way ahead.

Cancer is not a ‘new’. The ancient Greeks wrote of it and there are scattered records of it much earlier from other civilizations. Galen, wrote of it almost 2,000 years ago, attributing it to an imbalance in ‘black bile’, one of the four humors, which when out of balance, he claimed, lead to various diseases (This was the justification for the practice of ‘bleeding’ a patient that continued on into 18th and early 19th centuries, not that long ago). Such ‘humors’ were thought for centuries to be at the root of many diseases and infections across Europe until scientists, through the use of microscopes, began to understand that the cell was the basic building block of all life, and that there was a microbial world beneath and within the world readily observable to us. Galen’s views continued to hold sway until anatomists, through their careful dissections, realized that ‘black bile’ was a fabrication, an attempted explanation for something unseen at work within the body. Cancer then, along with our understanding of the body and disease, began its slow, lurching, advancement through the practice of science. What actually is cancer? Continue reading

On Rediscovering the World We’ve Been Ignoring: An Introduction to the Life Sciences and Our Need For It

Science is the study of life and the world around us, an exploration of the reality of the universe conducted from different ‘directions’ with the intent of understanding its endless aspects. Today, however, science in seeking to ‘peel back its layers, in attempting to clarify our place in it and improve the conditions within which we live along with our relationship with it, and each other, many have dismissed the effort and our effort to continue ‘doing’ science has become contentious. Knowing and its pursuit, has become a kind of ‘blasphemy’. Science has become politicized along with so much else. Many completely dismiss it as a wasteful effort, an attempt by elites to purposely complicate our lives with distractive and destructive nonsense, the value of expertise dismissed. For them life seems simple and obvious. Science, many claim, is an effort by ‘elites’ to obfuscate and to remove decision making ever further from the ‘people’…in doing this we are replacing curiosity and understanding with a willful ignorance, generalized fear and a ‘trust’ in those who simply, and loudly, claim to hold the answers, who demean all others and promise to return us to some ‘golden age’ fantasy of the past. They ‘reduce’ language, surrender clarity, replacing it with volume and repetition, shrink both what is acceptable for discussion and the lexicon with which we do so, rendering communications more open to confusion and misinterpretation, to manipulation. Language and speech, limited, regulated. Science can’t afford this. (Nor can any vital society.) Doubt and insecurity will overwhelm us, until we reclaim our right to knowledge. Reason, science and critical thinking, offer us a way out, a way to reclaim our agency, without destroying the world. Continue reading