Category Archives: Shared Biology

On Wilding and the Return of Nature: Thoughts on an Idea

Talk of environmental crises is everywhere, climate change, mass species extinctions, losses of critical habitat, the privatization of once public resources and landscapes (and their subsequent ‘pillaging’ by corporate entities), critically dropping aquifers, what a chaotic climate may mean for world agriculture and our food supply, a world beset by an increasing rate of diseases and diminishing efficacy of the tools we have to combat and treat them….it is daunting and depressing. At the same time, generally barely mentioned in mainstream media, are notices of studies and ideas of what we can do to not just lessen these problems, quite a few of which are being implemented, but to repair the organic and global systems, whose faltering is leading to these increasing problems and potential catastrophes. To make head way on these is going to require a much more concerted effort by most of us. What, many are asking, can we do to usher in a return to a healthier, better functioning, world…before any looming system ‘course corrections’ do the ‘work’ themselves, eliminating the human problem, that ’we’ have collectively become. 

Isabella Tree’s, “Wilding: the Return of Nature to a British Farm”, which prompted this post, supports an approach in which mankind takes on a more responsive and respectful, while simultaneously, a less active role, in the management of the landscape. A ‘less active role’ because what she’s describing requires that we step back, relinquish some control, and allow the powers of nature to heal itself, stepping in where, when and how we must when those ‘forces’, diminished to the point where they are ineffectual, need the support…but no more. She calls for us to trust that our own evolved status is a product of the natural world, a potent nature with the inherent capacities and tendencies, to create, balance and heal, in like proportion to what it ‘takes’ and consumes; that we reclaim our ‘membership’, our historical relationship with this place and all of the life with which we share it. We are active agents of change and must, to the same extent, do the necessary work to heal those wounds, we’ve inflicted upon it through our economic demands and  industrial power. Her story here is one of a shared fate and a faith in life, which is illustrated time and again as she and her husband, Charlie Burrell, work to understand the land and life they are beginning to re-envision, more as curious students than confident ‘experts’. The process quickly becomes one of open discovery as they attempt to understand the health of the place they previously managed as a farm, with the economic expectations of a modern world that has itself become disengaged from life, seeing it narrowly in economic terms that had long ago been separated from ecological reality, limits. and the richness of a place. Continue reading

Is a River Alive? On the Rights of Nature, an Adventure Story and a Shifting of the Dominant Paradigm

Being a horticulturist, a student of ecology, evolution and all of the usual life science topics, my reading list is long with books I find and others recommended to me by friends. This most recent is one of the latter, “Is a River Alive?”, by British writer Robert MacFarlane. I hadn’t read any of his other books and my friend John thought I’d enjoy it…I did. I listened to it and, as it was read by MacFarlane himself, he added a bit of rhythm and emotion in his reading that would not have been there were I reading it in book form. This is particularly significant as you read the more emotionally driven sections, which, in this format, the ‘Canadian’ section, turns out to be a rollicking, adrenaline laced adventure story. 

While focusing on rivers, this is a book about the rights of nature, legal and otherwise. Why, does the growing community of such thinkers and activists, seem to think nature, in all of its forms, from fungi to mountains, rivers to oceans, the grandest to the most minuscule living species, deserve rights comparable to we humans? What makes them so special? MacFarlane and his compatriots, would turn that around, instead asking what makes we humans so special as to deserve that which we deny literally all others? Their only value, in how they serve us….The rights of nature proponents do not argue simply for their own favorite species or place, many of those so advocating, and protesting, come from thousands of years old indigenous traditions, peoples who have always recognized the links between all living things and those places and forces which permit and support them. And this isn’t because they are simple, backwards, savages or naive. Such thinking is not born out of the heads of green patriots, earth firsters and narrowly focused academics. This is a movement based on memory, connection, of those living in relationship with, in which respect for all things comes first, a world in which life is a gift, to be treasured…all lives, all species, all places, it is a remembering that no one individual, species or place is so special that any and all others may be sacrificed for its needs, its demands, its hungers. Continue reading

The Emperor of all Maladies: Mukherjee’s look into Our Relationship with Cancer

Siddartha Mukherjee’s first book, “The Emperor of All Maladies: A Biography of Cancer”, is the third of his I’ve read. My interest earlier, and still, remains in understanding the biology of the organism, so I read his books on genetics and the cell first, trying to improve my understanding of the complex actions and structures of life before attempting to understand a disease that ravages and destroys so many lives. His effort to write this book led to Mukherjee receiving the Pulitzer Prize. It is a gargantuan endeavor, artfully constructed. It contains several stories in an overlapping, although, natural style beginning with man’s earliest recorded conception of the disease(s). It becomes clearer and clearer as you read through it that cancer is more a ‘family’ of diseases, linked by their pattens and effects as they progress within the cell and from there, into the collective structures of our body, than it is a singular disease. But that gets way ahead.

Cancer is not a ‘new’. The ancient Greeks wrote of it and there are scattered records of it much earlier from other civilizations. Galen, wrote of it almost 2,000 years ago, attributing it to an imbalance in ‘black bile’, one of the four humors, which when out of balance, he claimed, lead to various diseases (This was the justification for the practice of ‘bleeding’ a patient that continued on into 18th and early 19th centuries, not that long ago). Such ‘humors’ were thought for centuries to be at the root of many diseases and infections across Europe until scientists, through the use of microscopes, began to understand that the cell was the basic building block of all life, and that there was a microbial world beneath and within the world readily observable to us. Galen’s views continued to hold sway until anatomists, through their careful dissections, realized that ‘black bile’ was a fabrication, an attempted explanation for something unseen at work within the body. Cancer then, along with our understanding of the body and disease, began its slow, lurching, advancement through the practice of science. What actually is cancer? Continue reading